Three Cell Node
Every module shares one internal shape: a Knowledge cell, a Thinking cell and a Reasoning cell.
Read about 3CNIntelligence, closer to home.
A proposed model family by Fylume, built on research into the 3CN & MPN architecture.
Type a question. The diagram shows which domain modules a simple router would select, and which stay asleep.
Illustrative simulation. The interactive demonstration needs JavaScript. It shows which domain modules a simple router would select for a question — for example:
Yaob is Fylume’s proposed AI model family and the lab’s first flagship initiative. It is a research vehicle for one idea: a small shared cognitive core plus specialised modules, activated selectively, could deliver useful capability on ordinary hardware.
Yaob has not been released. There are no published benchmarks yet.
Yaob’s intended architecture uses one shared cognitive core responsible for general language and reasoning. The exploratory size target is approximately 1–10 billion parameters, subject to research and validation.
Specialised functionality is reached through domain-relevant network modules. These are not separate full conversational models running inside every node.
Every module shares one internal shape: a Knowledge cell, a Thinking cell and a Reasoning cell.
Read about 3CNSpecialised knowledge lives in domain modules. The shared core reaches only for the modules a question needs.
Read about MPNParameters are grouped by cell and node so modules can be added, replaced, disabled or removed.
Read about CNPA proposed three-cell structure for organising the conceptual nodes of a modular architecture.
Read moreA selectively accessible, domain-organised parameter network that a shared core can draw on when a task needs it.
Read moreAn exploratory scheme for how parameters are grouped inside cells and nodes so components can be added, replaced or removed.
Read moreTry a prompt below or select a module to inspect it. This is an architecture visualiser, not a running model.
Domain modules: Mathematics, Statistics, Computer Science, History, Politics, Literature, Linguistics, Law, Music Theory, Architecture, Physics, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Chemistry, Biology, Medicine, Meteorology, Geology, Earth Science, Geography, Economics, Finance, Software Engineering, Machine Learning, Computer Networking, Computer Engineering, Computer Architecture, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Energy, Aerodynamics, Aerospace Engineering.
Most questions need a little of a lot of knowledge, not all of it at once. If Yaob can avoid waking parameters a request does not need, it could run in less memory, on cheaper hardware, closer to the person using it.
Status: in research. The architecture is being designed and tested. No model weights are available, no benchmark results are published, and no hardware requirements have been verified.
No Yaob release is available yet. When one is, it will appear here with version, files, checksums, hardware notes and licence.
Fylume’s proposed model family. In research — no weights have been released.
Not released. No files are available to download.
Research code and documentation will be published on GitHub as they become ready.
Not yet. Yaob is a proposed model family under active research. There is no public release, and the Models page will only list files once they genuinely exist, with checksums and licences.
No. Until a Yaob inference endpoint is connected, the demo is an illustrative simulation of the routing idea: a transparent keyword router picks domain modules and the page explains why. Sample answers are written by Fylume and labelled as such.
No. One shared cognitive core is responsible for general language and reasoning. Domain modules are specialised parameter groups the core can draw on — not separate full conversational models.
The exploratory target for the shared core is roughly 1–10 billion parameters. That range is a research target, not a commitment, and will change as experiments report back.
Local execution on ordinary hardware is a central goal. We will not publish hardware requirements until we have measured them on real machines.
Open research and code are encouraged wherever appropriate. Licence terms will be stated on each release; until then, no licence is implied.
There is no evidence for that claim, and we will not make it. Frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic and others are extraordinary systems. Our question is different: how much useful capability can fit in a much smaller, selectively activated budget? Benchmarks will be published with methodology when they exist.